Feature Request: make undo more fine-grained
Reported by marzapower | May 27th, 2009 @ 09:46 PM
Try this:
- Open redcar
- Create a new file
- Type 'a' --> a
- Select 'a' and press '(' --> (a)
- Select '(a)' and press '[' --> [(a)]
- Select '[(a)]' and press '{' --> {[(a)]}
- Undo (Ctrl-Z) --> '' Expected: [(a)]
It seems like the undo is missing or not correctly registering some step. This occurs even for a bunch of other actions, mostly cut/paste/undo actions. I will provide you with examples as soon as I can replicate them.
Comments and changes to this ticket
-
Daniel Lucraft May 28th, 2009 @ 08:14 AM
- Title changed from “The 'undo' command is missing steps” to “Feature Request: make undo more fine-grained”
- Tag set to “editview, feature, undo”
- State changed from “new” to “open”
Yes, this to do with how GtkSourceView (or maybe GtkTextView) works. It combines 'nearby' edits into a single 'action' and Redcar doesn't override that. Maybe it should. I have changed this to a feature request for that reason. Is that alright?
However, there are more bugs related to undo and copy/paste and I would be very grateful if you were able to find some reproducible examples of those.
-
Daniel Lucraft January 31st, 2010 @ 08:15 AM
- State changed from “open” to “resolved”
We're closing bugs from the old GTK+ version. Please try out the JRuby Redcar!
Please Sign in or create a free account to add a new ticket.
With your very own profile, you can contribute to projects, track your activity, watch tickets, receive and update tickets through your email and much more.
Create new ticket
Create your profile
Help contribute to this project by taking a few moments to create your personal profile. Create your profile ยป
A programmer's text editor for Gnome.
Daniel Lucraft
marzapower