<<- strings not highlighting correctly
Reported by y_feldblum (at yahoo) | December 9th, 2010 @ 09:10 PM
Ruby syntax permits usage such as
a = <<-ENDDOC.lines.map(&:strip).join
a927fd92a927fd92a927fd92a927fd92
a927fd92a927fd92a927fd92a927fd92
a927fd92a927fd92a927fd92a927fd92
a927fd92a927fd92a927fd92a927fd92
ENDDOC
In this example, .lines.map(&:strip).join
should not be highlighted as being part of the string. They should
be highlighted as regular Ruby method calls. Only the prhase
<<-ENDDOC
by itself, and the lines following
until ENDDOC
, should be highlighted.
However, I wonder if it is even possible to parse this using modern simple parsers.
Comments and changes to this ticket
-
tim.felgentreff (at student.hpi.uni-potsdam) February 19th, 2011 @ 01:15 PM
Is this working correctly in Textmate? The Textmate Ruby bundle has a lengthy comment on heardocs to explain how and why they are broken. There simply isn't a way for us to highlight every use of them correctly within the constraints of Textmate grammars. But if it works on TM, it should work on Redcar.
-
ronin-98500 (at lighthouseapp) February 27th, 2011 @ 04:08 PM
There are other uses of heredocs that aren't highlighted correctly, e.g.
foo(<<EOF) This is a string EOF
or
def foo <<EOF This is a string EOF end
Both don't highlight the heredoc as a string, but as Ruby code. But these uses aren't that common I think, so it's probably OK to not highlight them correctly. I'm on Linux, so no Textmate to test with. :-(
Please Sign in or create a free account to add a new ticket.
With your very own profile, you can contribute to projects, track your activity, watch tickets, receive and update tickets through your email and much more.
Create your profile
Help contribute to this project by taking a few moments to create your personal profile. Create your profile ยป
A programmer's text editor for Gnome.